Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

East of England - North, Cancer Alliance

Management of High Grade Dysplasia patients

Time period: 2015-19
Cancer Alliance National
Number of High Grade Dysplasia patients in audit 158 1448
Cancer Alliance National
Method of Diagnosis
– First diagnosis confirmed by second pathologist 150 94.7% 86.9%
Treatment planning
– HGD plan discussed at MDT 144 91.1% 87.9%
– Treatment plan for active treatment 139 88.2% 81.1%
First treatment
– Endoscopic therapy (such as endoscopic resection) 137 86.8% 73.8%
– Surveillance 14 8.6% 11.0%

Management of oesophago-gastric cancer patients

Time period: 2017-2019
Organisation National
Number of oesophago-gastric (OG) cancer patients in audit 179 20528
Case ascertainment for OG cancer (%) 85-100%
Method of Diagnosis
– Patients diagnosed after an emergency admission**
** Percent figure accounts for differences in mix of patients across organisations
25 15.1% 13.3%
– Patients with referral source reported as unknown 0 0.0% 1.8%
Pre-treatment staging of cancer
– Patients having staging CT scan recorded 165 92.2% 86.9%
Treatment planning
– Patients having a plan for curative treatment 84 46.9% 38.5%
– Patients having a plan for non-curative treatment 95 53.1% 61.5%
– Patients with non-curative plans having chemotherapy or radiotherapy 36 37.9% 48.2%

Outcomes for OG cancer patients who have curative surgery

Time period: 2016-2019
Organisation National
Number of patients having surgery 205 6273
Length of stay, median (days) 10 11
Operations in which 15 or more lymph nodes were examined (%) 95.1% 86.6%
30-day postoperative mortality (%) 0.6% 1.7%
90-day postoperative mortality (%) 3.4% 3.3%
Oesophageal surgery
Number of patients having oesophageal surgery 125 N/A
Oesophageal patients with positive longitudinal margins (%) 0.0% 4.2%
Oesophageal patients with positive circumferential margins (%) 9.0% 24.2%
Gastric surgery
Number of patients having gastric surgery 80 N/A
Gastric patients with positive longitudinal margins (%) 4.3% 8.1%

Compare trust outcomes

Download this data as a PDF